<< vorherige Seite
nächste Seite >>

SOMETHING ABOUT THE HORSE.
753
high-priest and consul. Verus, another Roman Emperor, erected a statue of gold to his horse, and fed him with raisins and almonds from his own hand. When the creature died, he was buried with great pomp, all the dignitaries of the empire attending; after which, a magnificent monument was erected to his memory on the Vatican Hill.
It was this high appreciation of the horse which inspired the poet of the land of Uz, that made Solomon liken his mistress for beauty “ to a company of horses in Pharaoh's chariots.”
It is by viewing the horse only in the light of a war-steed, or as an appendage of royalty, that we can explain many passages, not only in the Old Testament but in the Greek and Latin clas­sics. Even during the Trojan war these ani­mals were exclusively in the retinue of princes, and were always associated with the glorious forthcoming of kings. It is in times compara­tively modern that the horse has become a beast of burden; in the East, more particularly in Arabia, he is still preserved from labor, save to carry his master on his errands of pleasure, or with him engage in the strife of war.
Homer represents that the horses of Achilles wept for Patroclus, and makes those of Rhesus speak of their good fortune. Aristotle mentions a horse of Sythia that precipitated himself from the top of a high rock in order to punish him­self for committing a base act.
The Arab poet, Eldemire, relates that the Calif Merouan had a horse that never permitted his groom to enter his apartments without being called. The hapless fellow chancing one day to forget this observance, the animal became indignant, and seized the groom in his teeth and ground him against the marble of his manger.
Pausanius relates that he knew a horse that showed himself completely conscious of his tri­umphs, and that whenever he won a prize in the race at the Olympic games, proudly directed his steps toward the tribunal of the judges to claim his crown.
Pride, which is eminently becoming in the horse, sometimes in him degenerates into dis­dain. Bucephalus, according to Plutarch, when once caparisoned, would let no one approach him but Alexander.
Among the patriarchs of the nomadic tribes the horse is still the intellectual companion of the chief, occupying so large a share of his affec­tions that his wife and children hold a second place. The Arab repeats the immemorial prov­erb, that “ He who forgets the beauty of horses for the beauty of woman will never prosper,” and exulting in the favor of Ali, exclaims, “Long tresses and long manes will be seen among us until the day of the resurrection!“ The warrior caste still maintains its supremacy, and we hear the lamentations of Abd-el-Kader, that many of the horses of the Arab race have fallen from their nobility because employed in tillage, in carrying burdens, and doing useful rather than ornamental work. He declares that if the true horse even treads upon the plowed land he diminishes in value, and illus­trates the idea by the following story:
“ A man was riding upon a horse of pure blood when he was met by his enemy, also splendidly mounted. One pursued the other, and he who gave chase was distanced by him who fled. De­spairing of reaching him, the pursuer in anger shouted out,
THE ARABIAN.
Whatever may be said to the contrary, there is but one true horse in the world, and that is the Arab stallion. His beautiful, nay, sublime description by Job, is the inspiration of one who only sees what he describes in its most perfect state—a thing you look at as you look at the stars, distant, but living with glory. As with all the ancients, the horse in Job's mind was only associated with royalty, spoken of as the attend­ant of princes, or connected with the fascinating yet terrible accompaniments of war; for he was never seen, as in our times, occupied in the familiar and beneficial purposes of draught in our streets, and husbandry in our fields. A modern reader, therefore, must enter into the sentiment and feeling of antiquity in order to fully appreciate this description of the horse. The old patriarch wrote it while sitting under his tent in the Arabian desert; looking out from under its folds, he beheld all other domesticated animals subservient and deformed by labor—the horse alone shone forth in its primitive glory. We can imagine him in his pride as he stood before Job, who, admiring, in the enthusiasm of the moment, asks,
“ Hast thou given to the horse strength?”
The rays of an Oriental sun flash along his silken coat, and he continues, “ Hast thou clothed his neck with the thunder-flash?”
The noble animal displays its energies in playful gambols, when Job, now full of enthusi­asm, fairly daguerreotypes the scene:
“ Hast thou made him to leap forth like the arrow ? The glory of his nostrils is terrible; He paweth in the valley, and rejoiceth in his strength.”
Vol. XIII.—No. 78.—3 B

<< vorherige Seite
Dr. Alexander Quinte, 2007
nächste Seite >>