| 
       | 
    ||||
| 
       SOMETHING
      ABOUT THE HORSE.  | 
    
       753  | 
    |||
| 
       | 
    ||||
      ![]()  | 
    ||||
| 
       | 
    ||||
| 
       high-priest and consul. Verus, 
      another Roman Emperor, erected a statue of gold to his horse, and fed him 
      with raisins and almonds from his own hand. When the creature died, he was 
      buried with great pomp, all the dignitaries of the empire attending; after 
      which, a magnificent monument was erected to his memory on the Vatican 
      Hill.  | 
    
       It was this high appreciation of 
      the horse which inspired the poet of the land of Uz, that made Solomon 
      liken his mistress for beauty “ to a company of horses in Pharaoh's 
      chariots.” 
      It is by viewing the horse only 
      in the light of a war-steed, or as an appendage of royalty, that we can 
      explain many passages, not only in the Old Testament but in the Greek and 
      Latin classics. Even during the Trojan war these animals were 
      exclusively in the retinue of princes, and were always associated with the 
      glorious forthcoming of kings. It is in times comparatively modern 
      that the horse has become a beast of burden; in the East, more 
      particularly in Arabia, he is still preserved from labor, save to carry 
      his master on his errands of pleasure, or with him engage in the strife of 
      war. 
      Homer represents that the horses 
      of Achilles wept for Patroclus, and makes those of Rhesus speak of their 
      good fortune. Aristotle mentions a horse of Sythia that precipitated 
      himself from the top of a high rock in order to punish himself for 
      committing a base act. 
      The Arab poet, Eldemire, relates 
      that the Calif Merouan had a horse that never permitted his groom to enter 
      his apartments without being called. The hapless fellow chancing one day 
      to forget this observance, the animal became indignant, and seized the 
      groom in his teeth and ground him against the marble of his 
      manger. 
      Pausanius relates that he knew a 
      horse that showed himself completely conscious of his triumphs, and 
      that whenever he won a prize in the race at the Olympic games, proudly 
      directed his steps toward the tribunal of the judges to claim his 
      crown. 
      Pride, which is eminently 
      becoming in the horse, sometimes in him degenerates into disdain. 
      Bucephalus, according to Plutarch, when once caparisoned, would let no one 
      approach him but Alexander. 
      Among the patriarchs of the 
      nomadic tribes the horse is still the intellectual companion of the chief, 
      occupying so large a share of his affections that his wife and 
      children hold a second place. The Arab repeats the immemorial 
      proverb, that “ He who forgets the beauty of horses for the beauty of 
      woman will never prosper,” and exulting in the favor of Ali, exclaims, 
      “Long tresses and long manes will be seen among us until the day of the 
      resurrection!“ The warrior caste still maintains its supremacy, and we 
      hear the lamentations of Abd-el-Kader, that many of the horses of the Arab 
      race have fallen from their nobility because employed in tillage, in 
      carrying burdens, and doing useful rather than ornamental work. He 
      declares that if the true horse even treads upon the plowed land he 
      diminishes in value, and illustrates the idea by the following 
      story: 
      “ A man was riding upon a horse 
      of pure blood when he was met by his enemy, also splendidly mounted. One 
      pursued the other, and he who gave chase was distanced by him who fled. 
      Despairing of reaching him, the pursuer in anger shouted 
      out,  | 
    |||
      ![]()  | 
    ||||
| 
       
								THE ARABIAN.  | 
    ||||
| 
       Whatever may be said to the 
      contrary, there is but one true horse in the world, and that is the Arab 
      stallion. His beautiful, nay, sublime description by Job, is the 
      inspiration of one who only sees what he describes in its most perfect 
      state—a thing you look at as you look at the stars, distant, but living 
      with glory. As with all the ancients, the horse in Job's mind was only 
      associated with royalty, spoken of as the attendant of princes, or 
      connected with the fascinating yet terrible accompaniments of war; for he 
      was never seen, as in our times, occupied in the familiar and beneficial 
      purposes of draught in our streets, and husbandry in our fields. A modern 
      reader, therefore, must enter into the sentiment and feeling of antiquity 
      in order to fully appreciate this description of the horse. The old 
      patriarch wrote it while sitting under his tent in the Arabian desert; 
      looking out from under its folds, he beheld all other domesticated animals 
      subservient and deformed by labor—the horse alone shone forth in its 
      primitive glory. We can imagine him in his pride as he stood before Job, 
      who, admiring, in the enthusiasm of the moment, asks, 
      “ Hast thou given to the horse 
      strength?” 
      The rays of an Oriental sun flash 
      along his silken coat, and he continues, “ Hast thou 
      clothed his neck with the thunder-flash?” 
      The noble animal displays its 
      energies in playful gambols, when Job, now full of enthusiasm, fairly 
      daguerreotypes the scene: 
      “ Hast thou made him to leap 
      forth like the arrow ? The glory of his nostrils is terrible; He paweth in 
      the valley, and rejoiceth in his strength.”  | 
    ||||
| 
       | 
    ||||
| 
       Vol. XIII.—No. 78.—3 B  | 
    ||||
| 
       | 
    ||||
| 
									 
										Dr. Alexander Quinte, 2007 
								 |