|  | ||||
| SOMETHING ABOUT THE HORSE. | 757 | |||
|  | ||||
|  | ||||
|  | ||||
|  | ||||
|  | ||||
| NORTH AMERICAN INDIANS AND THEIR PONIES. | ||||
|  | ||||
| quently the “ Indian pony” 
      possesses less intelligence than he would if he had a more 
      considerate trainer. When a chief dies they sacrifice his war-steed 
      over his grave, that he may go well-mounted into the presence of the “ 
      Great Spirit.” The horse, to them, may be considered a vessel to 
      carry them over their boundless prairies, assist them in hunting the 
      buffalo, and aid them in their war excursions. Occasionally these 
      vast fields of vegetation, dried by the summer sun, ignite, and a 
      conflagration takes place such as can be witnessed nowhere else in the 
      world. On roll the devouring flames, crackling and exulting, while 
      the dark clouds of smoke obscure the sun and stifle the atmosphere. It is 
      on these occasions that the Indian and his horse have a chase for life; 
      and often, in spite of their combined sagacity and fleetness, they are 
      overtaken and destroyed. The same natural causes which 
      operate to make the home of the horse and of man identical in our own 
      day, served to bring them together in the first ages of their 
      existence. The size of the brute rendered it conspicuous; and it is 
      presumable that he was at first hunted alone as a luxurious food. Compared 
      with the flesh of the horse that of the ox is coarse in the extreme, 
      the two presenting all the differences that distinguish the commonest 
      canvas from the finest cambric. The fibre of the horse is delicate, 
      and the colors it displays in its perfect form defy the pencil by their 
      beauty. The muscles of the horse are arranged more symmetrically 
      than those of any other animal, and the general aspect of the creature's 
      frame, upon dissection, enforces the idea of a beast of 
      supe- | rior order. Few have ever made 
      themselves practically acquainted with the beautiful mechanical 
      construction of the horse, without imbibing even a higher respect for 
      him than is realized by the superficial examination of his outside form. 
      But all this delicacy and beauty rather destroys than tempts the human 
      appetite, and this circumstance, added to the intrinsic value of the 
      horse, has discouraged hippophagy —a taste attempted to be revived by many 
      intelligent “savans” (?) in France. Acceptable as the flesh of the 
      horse may have been to the palates of the early representatives of 
      mankind, it is probable they were not able to indulge in an excess of this 
      kind of food. The animal was difficult to approach, and could hardly be 
      taken by surprise; once alarmed, pursuit was hopeless, and, in a close 
      encounter, the issue would be very doubtful. It is, therefore, probable 
      that the horse was captured by means of pitfalls and similar contrivances 
      peculiar to all barbarians. The carcass was alone desired—the life of 
      the victim was in no way regarded. The Scandinavians and Germans, 
      devoted to the worship of Odin, raised with the utmost care, in the “ 
      sacred pastures,” a breed of white horses destined for immolation to the 
      gods which they adored. Once sacrificed, the fumes of their roasting 
      carcasses were left for the “ superior beings;” the flesh was sensed 
      up at the festive board. From this custom probably originated 
      the taste for this kind of food which existed among all the nations of the 
      north, until Christianity penetrated Europe and succeeded in 
      destroying the custom, because it was supposed to be directly 
      connected with the rites of | |||
|  | ||||
| 
										Dr. Alexander Quinte, 2007 |