<< vorherige Seite
nächste Seite >>

760
HARPER'S NEW MONTHLY MAGAZINE.
probably coeval with their subjection to the use of man, but “racing,” as understood in our day, is of comparative recent date. As early as the reign of Henry II., Smithfield, in En­gland, was a mart for horses, and those offered for sale were, no doubt, skillfully displayed and matched against each other to show off their qualities. In these early days speed was not a requisite; it required only strength to carry a warrior and his coat of mail. The invention of gunpowder, and the consequent abandonment of armor, not only changed the art of war, but created a demand for an entirely different horse. Swiftness now became a requisite, and attend­ants upon this power came beauty of form and the necessity of superior blood. Instead of be­ing associated exclusively with the labors of the
plow, or with the alarms of war, the horse in­sensibly became an object of amusement as well as utility, so that in the time of Elizabeth they were used in the pastimes of festal gather­ings. In the commencement of the succeeding reign private matches between gentlemen, then their own jockeys, became common. The true merits of the horse, in the natural course of things, now rapidly developed themselves, and we find that James I. made racing a royal amusement, and set the example of paying large prices for foreign horses of supposed superior breed. In the reign of Charles I. races became common at Newmarket and Hyde Park, and the precedent was established of making the prizes run for silver cups, instead of coin. Charles II. encouraged the sports of the turf, and under
THE HUNTER.

<< vorherige Seite
Dr. Alexander Quinte, 2007
nächste Seite >>